Mass fish kills were first reported and attributed to reclamation activities by The Star Online on February 16, 2014. At least 10 fish farms and 250 traditional fishermen were impacted as far away as three kilometers from the site. DOE reported losses of up to USD $1.38 million by fish breeders in the area, although the fish kills were not linked conclusively to the reclamation.

A month later, officials from the opposition Democratic Action Party (DAP) denounced the reclamation project. Members of the KPRJ, the Johor state investment arm and equity partner in Forest City, denied that reclamation activities had contributed to fish kills. Another Johor DAP official expressed concern that sedimentation caused by the Forest City reclamation would threaten access to the Port of Tanjung Pelepas (PTP). In addition, PTP’s previously approved expansion plans would bring the port’s footprint very close to the new land area being reclaimed by Country Garden.

Despite the concerns of some Malaysian politicians, local residents, and fishermen, political opposition to Forest City failed to gain traction until May. By that time, Singapore had sent two diplomatic notes to the Malaysian federal government asking for details about the projected environmental impacts of the Forest City reclamation project as well as a development timeline. Unsatisfied with responses from Johor, Singapore escalated its concerns, appealing to the national government to adhere to international law regarding transboundary impacts. Singapore’s expressions of concern generated intense media coverage.

With pressure mounting, CGPV ceased its reclamation work on June 15, 2014, two days before the federal Department of Environment issued a stop work order. According to multiple sources, however, CGPV reportedly resumed reclamation activities in contradiction of the order.